If you are going to bust
certainly see that poor dog
mentioned by the people.
Changing the name of the city, and voila, a chant of Rodari lent itself nicely to introduce a topic that is discussed with heat in recent days. The dog
the poet has a strange feature. E 'headless poor "ane". It 'a dog of Florence, and his head, he says, gliel'hanno eaten,.
Ours, however, the head has it, and it is a splendid example of German shepherd. He, poor, has become famous without his knowledge and without any guilt whatsoever. But let us proceed with order.
E 'perhaps from the beginning of term, a couple of years ago or so, the news began to circulate: the director of Public Works of the Municipality of Busto Arsizio went to the office with his dog. We talked about it a lot: aldermen, councilors, employees of the City. Then it was repeated: an objective fact and fancy a bit 'ridiculous.
What inevitably clashed with the normal people with a normal job, it was primarily the legality of that type of behavior: since when an employee brings your pet to work? We are in the public service, of course. Yet ask those who work there, and they'll tell you that is not the land of toys even the machine city, and is not allowed to derogate from pipelines and other modes of behavior not appropriate to their roles. And yet ... something you could not understand: if everyone knew, if it caused irritation and jokes abounded, because nobody said anything? Why do those who could not intervene? Do not ask the public response, he has not yet understood.
Then, a few weeks ago we had the opportunity to test directly, in a case with the secretary of a majority party, the arrival of the director in question: the late hours of the morning with a large four-legged on a leash. For the mutterings of disapproval of the powerful politician on our side, we were puzzled to think so: certainly the friend of mind is too delicate to come forward! But what happens if we, rough city councilors, we do our duty and demand an explanation with a question, at least to know who authorized it, and under which directive, what is a clear privilege? And so we did. Let there be any misunderstanding we want to animals an immense good. It certainly did not hit the dog to hit the master failing to respond to others but to ourselves - to hands-on, as they say - when we hit the person directly concerned we do it without hesitation. That the public works sector is not working as it should have been told in the City Council during the Budget debate. Declaration on the file. That whoever has the responsibility, both political and managerial, should answer for its actions, as well. The political conspiracy to cover or do not serve the poor sense of character, nor the lack of respect for colleagues. Which not only would the right to do the same thing, but probably juggles every day among the many tasks of life: to care for children and for monitoring, elderly requiring the presence and attention, loved animals but which during the day there is a system, because saints in heaven there are none. Not to mention the respect for citizens who might not accept, for hygiene reasons if nothing else, the presence of animals in a public office. For such people, by the way, is forbidden to enter office with them, animals!
The fact that we are showing has value in itself, indifferent to the arrogance of behavior that indicates. But not only. Invests direclty management of public affairs, not value is neither right nor left, but constitutional. And in which all political forces must be united if they want to change something. Starting from the top, of course, because the fish, when it stinks, it stinks from the head. And do not pretend not to know that the administration of the city for so long, too long, the air is decidedly flawed. E 'up to us to highlight once again.
way: you know how it ends Rodari of the nursery rhyme? Here are the last lines:
Living Headless
is not the worst of the trouble:
many people have it
but never uses it.
" The poets will also be none, but they have the power to honor" (R. Flack).
certainly see that poor dog
mentioned by the people.
Changing the name of the city, and voila, a chant of Rodari lent itself nicely to introduce a topic that is discussed with heat in recent days. The dog
the poet has a strange feature. E 'headless poor "ane". It 'a dog of Florence, and his head, he says, gliel'hanno eaten,
Ours, however, the head has it, and it is a splendid example of German shepherd. He, poor, has become famous without his knowledge and without any guilt whatsoever. But let us proceed with order.
E 'perhaps from the beginning of term, a couple of years ago or so, the news began to circulate: the director of Public Works of the Municipality of Busto Arsizio went to the office with his dog. We talked about it a lot: aldermen, councilors, employees of the City. Then it was repeated: an objective fact and fancy a bit 'ridiculous.
What inevitably clashed with the normal people with a normal job, it was primarily the legality of that type of behavior: since when an employee brings your pet to work? We are in the public service, of course. Yet ask those who work there, and they'll tell you that is not the land of toys even the machine city, and is not allowed to derogate from pipelines and other modes of behavior not appropriate to their roles. And yet ... something you could not understand: if everyone knew, if it caused irritation and jokes abounded, because nobody said anything? Why do those who could not intervene? Do not ask the public response, he has not yet understood.
Then, a few weeks ago we had the opportunity to test directly, in a case with the secretary of a majority party, the arrival of the director in question: the late hours of the morning with a large four-legged on a leash. For the mutterings of disapproval of the powerful politician on our side, we were puzzled to think so: certainly the friend of mind is too delicate to come forward! But what happens if we, rough city councilors, we do our duty and demand an explanation with a question, at least to know who authorized it, and under which directive, what is a clear privilege? And so we did. Let there be any misunderstanding we want to animals an immense good. It certainly did not hit the dog to hit the master failing to respond to others but to ourselves - to hands-on, as they say - when we hit the person directly concerned we do it without hesitation. That the public works sector is not working as it should have been told in the City Council during the Budget debate. Declaration on the file. That whoever has the responsibility, both political and managerial, should answer for its actions, as well. The political conspiracy to cover or do not serve the poor sense of character, nor the lack of respect for colleagues. Which not only would the right to do the same thing, but probably juggles every day among the many tasks of life: to care for children and for monitoring, elderly requiring the presence and attention, loved animals but which during the day there is a system, because saints in heaven there are none. Not to mention the respect for citizens who might not accept, for hygiene reasons if nothing else, the presence of animals in a public office. For such people, by the way, is forbidden to enter office with them, animals!
The fact that we are showing has value in itself, indifferent to the arrogance of behavior that indicates. But not only. Invests direclty management of public affairs, not value is neither right nor left, but constitutional. And in which all political forces must be united if they want to change something. Starting from the top, of course, because the fish, when it stinks, it stinks from the head. And do not pretend not to know that the administration of the city for so long, too long, the air is decidedly flawed. E 'up to us to highlight once again.
way: you know how it ends Rodari of the nursery rhyme? Here are the last lines:
Living Headless
is not the worst of the trouble:
many people have it
but never uses it.
" The poets will also be none, but they have the power to honor" (R. Flack).