important week, in the City Council. It was voted Forecast Report. And 'the tool in which they are synthesized and summarized in financial terms, the objectives and planning of those who govern the city. That is to say what they think needs to bust, and what they intend to do our administrators?
say a commonplace: that the public summary of financial data is presented often as little understandable why non-professionals are not always in a position to capture all the elements of assessment to determine whether or not those numbers correspond to the specific expectations of those who live in the area. And if the promises of previous years on projects expected to be achieved have been maintained, and how.
We try to give us, the PD, a number of facts that lead to understanding the assessment that has motivated our vote against it, hoping that at least this is understandable to many. First
. We will continue to pay the new tax was introduced last year, personal income tax quell'addizionale who say they know so well as the League and Berlusconi, " puts his hands in the pockets of citizens" ; those of Busto, specifically. In 2008, four million will pay . They took with ICI on the one hand, and took the other, and often families have lost more than earned. Note: the ICI has also lowered the center-left government, reimbursing municipalities for what has not been collected. If you expect to make demagogic operations yesterday - we all know that national governments have the abolition of this tax in their programs - citizens today would not pay anyway, and the municipality would have more money in cash. Great sense of politics!
An aside: the roller coaster of the Five Bridges , quell'obbrobrio League and allies who have made and called "Passerelle" is cost about € 3.5 million . Almost like the first year of tax. Thanks! According
. Already last year the province had to have a contribution of 300,000 € for the reduction of the waste tax . There was granted to "compensate" the presence of local city incinerator Accame. Contribution made to the budget and then removed because they did not know if it would come. Has not arrived.
And what do they do this year? Replace the sum of the first budget, plus that of 2008, around € 600,000. Not even know if this time comes, and then why write? Probably "Makes the scene."
Bottom line: people continue to pay the tax on waste, no discounts. Comes then the money? Who knows, I do not even know them. What is certain is that in 2009 there will be no more. The tax does.
We pay more taxes, there are no discounts, we have an ongoing - risky for us - we undue financial transaction in the coming years, but it could bring money for capital works, buildings or major renovation, which affect the city and its future development. What can a typically pragmatic thinking citizen of our envelope? If you have to make sacrifices, you do: it means serving to re-start the city.
Think evil, poor man. Not only there are no commitments of resources as defined, but you will not even put things in the budget last year. What? We compared item by item to the 2007 and 2008 Forecast: no accommodation of Our Lady Queen of the Square, no roadway improvements via Montegrappa / off Piombino, no enlargement Gymnasium High School, taken € 400,000 for restructuring of the Colony of Alassio, lighting 570.00 Public Service Integrated Water 1,300,000, 500,000 and scalable system to ex-Hupac
... Why, we wondered? We went to review the assessors' reports, and we quote directly from the Councillor Public Works (Girola, league): "... to avoid any form of debt for the construction of public works."
Councillor, public works are getting into debt, with the mortgages, not to be paid in cash! The explanation, however, complete with what he writes that the financial statements, Cattaneo (AN / PdL): "not to increase the debt, including arrears on account of the subject of recognition." In a nutshell, we have too many debts incurred in previous years. Flying on quell'anche-there may be additional reasons, perhaps related to efficient (!) Councillor for Public Works? - Naturally arises two questions. Who did those debt? Two Leaguers arrived, and a center-half. That is them!
Then, last year there were no debts, or had not seen them?
No more room - but still a lot to say! - So we come to the "budget" means there are goals, not specific programs, not an idea of \u200b\u200bthe city to discuss, no money.
prediction ... let's leave to the reader.
0 comments:
Post a Comment