Online Roulette 0.01 Min

COMMENT Director Marcora that public esteem. PARTICIPATION IN NATURAL

Thanks for the comment.
Thanks for dissent. The purpose of HERE I AM! is to promote dialogue. That's it!
I expect other contributions.
So do not be a good Christian.
entering a mosque in Istanbul, I made the sign dela cross, like a greeting.
I do not have to enter. I apologized, I did not want to offend the susceptibilities of the "guardian", but I could not enter the mosque.
My mother was a child, I said "ask the other cheek," but then warned, "... and remember that I made you two."
Friendliness. For the next poem ... wait.

Thermostat Compatibility Chart

The taste for small and big things in life

few weeks have passed a pleasant evening to the Family bustocco. We had a beautiful book of poems "Here I am" of our director, Gianluigi Marcora. A fair reading accompanied by the notes of a guitar, the songs and the melody alternating with an extraordinary voice, that of Walter Fazio. Pleasant, in particular, for those of us who choose to devote to voluntary policy a part of their lives. For one night get out of the habit of meetings, meetings, deepening of the issues you face every day. Subtracting time from work and family. But most of all for an evening gatherings taste for big and small things that fill life and are part of its meaning, and that "we" inevitably subtract an important choice because it restricts other.
In that context, a reflection spontaneous, immediate, arose almost by itself: in a historical period characterized by change and discontinuity, which inevitably produce a sense of dissolution of identity, loss of roots, the meeting of people that are part of the same community is an extraordinary little gem in its simplicity.
The roots is one of the most important and unrecognized needs of the human soul. It 'also the most difficult to define. Through its participation in real, active and natural alll'esistenza of a community that keeps alive some treasures from the past, and some intentions for the future, the human being has a root. Participation natural, given that the place almost automatically, from birth, occupation, environment. Religion.
in every human being requires multiple roots. He needs to get most of his life moral, intellectual, spiritual, through the rooms where naturally belongs.
This perception lingered that night, much of this we handed those poems. The charm is not finished, but continued in personal reading of the book. Until it was discontinued. Sharply. The sweetness of the words has become bitterness, fear the opening of the heart, the poetry division of man by man.
the souls of others, is the rock on which we have stumbled. We speak of our religion and Islam. There is talk of poly contenders. "We can go in Islam to build churches? We can put a statue, an image of Christ in a mosque? And pray in front of a Christian symbol? ... We can not . Even the followers of Islam, in our house, must be able to say "we can not " without expecting anything, not even the consideration of those who, for too well, or ignorance, is willing to sell the tradition and the life of the soul : his and others. "
We went to recover the fine book by Joseph Ratzinger: Jesus of Nazareth . We have re-read the paragraph on the parable of the Good Samaritan, and calm returned to the heart and of reason.
Our Lord teaches: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all thy mind and thy neighbor as thyself." (Lk 10:27).
no addition: as long as you love your neighbor to turn the same way, and depending on how long you live and place that suits. Pope Ratzinger page. 234 explains: "So here the question has changed: no longer a question of who among the others who is my neighbor or not. This is myself. I have to become the next so that the other counts for me as . You can not bring back the splendor of that chapter, you need to read, meditate, introjected. And live it every day, whatever the cost and how much effort it costs.
In our small, we think that the exchange of influences between very different environments are equally necessary because the roots within the natural order. A certain environment to be influenced not so much from the outside, or not only, to be enriched. Rather than being encouraged to make their lives more intense and their identity.
In compliance with the rules and duties of the State, by each.
Tradition is imported. Defines a community. But we can not sacrifice the truth and the way taught by our religion, our faith or cultural affiliation.
would be heresy. This would sell the life of the soul. Not only ours, but all the little men of tomorrow, to whom we deliver a better world to live.
"We, from our hearts, learning again the risk of goodness" (Ratzinger, p.. 236, ibid). What weapon
extraordinary, then, poetry! That already written reflects a particular moment. It's another to write, director. We look forward to

South Park With Subtitles

TRUTH 'AND FORM! FACTS AND LIES

At my specific request, information shall be published the transcript of my speech in the city council in the three minutes allowed for each group, the outcome of the referendum.
The report, not yet formally placed after the transcription, however, is clear and shows what shameful figure liar and a "Mr." Antonello Corrado, Earl of Afragola!

Councillor Erica D'Adda (L 'Olive - Democratic Party)
Thank you, I would first like to express my sympathy to the intervention of Councillor Salomone regarding the Tibet, Tibet and the Pro Patria, in fact, maybe we went a bit 'oltre.Due seconds only, I wanted to take the floor to express my full solidarity with those around fifty-seven thousand citizens believe that Sunday did not go to vote, perhaps they are wise and not so foolish or uninformed as they try to pass, so I hope that the Administration takes this too . And I would say above all, I believe that the referendum is an act absolutely democratic and democracy coast, so I'm not sure which one is opposed to these aspects of the referendum, the referendum but I wish I could say after so many months of controversy and even unnecessary equipment, it would be wise even know how to lose, and lose with style. Thanks

Syncro Card For Card Maker

Letter to the Director of Information

Dear Sir,

published in the latest issue I read with shock and human compassion that a fellow columnist, Antonello Corrado, resorts to pure lie to attack my person, and with me, I believe, the party that I represent.
Arguing on the Referendum on May 25, at one point of criticism about the citizens who voted.
I quote: "Just to give one of the examples, Councillor D'Adda, the Democratic Party during the last session of the City Council, with a turn of phrase, essentially because of the" dumb "to his fellow citizens who voted : This is not political ethics. "
The Lord uses the phrase "turn of phrase," I think it smart enough to circumvent a possible denial.
was reassured. Not only is the denial, by Councillor D'Adda expressed precisely the opposite concept, namely that people stayed in what, 92% of bustocco, could not be considered "stupid."
But, since the City Council, there is a verbalization of what is being said and this can not compare two points of view, but a fact and a lie.
So it is also possible to refer the matter through the courts and restore the truth.
If there will be an official denial, this is the only way that I consider viable.
I do not think this will change the character of the political confrontation replaces the denigration staff.
may serve the citizens know that their dignity is not trucks, and are willing to fight to assert it.

Erica D'Adda

Racquetball Wrist Cord

POLICY TO BUST! What were you thinking as he spoke Farioli Marcegaglia the unit?

13, 27, May 10. It is not the recitation of the rosary, but the dates of the last councils. They all share a characteristic bleak lack the deliberative acts . That is to say, those measures that characterize the work of the junta, and promote healthy debate between the opposition political forces, are anticipated for concrete actions in the area. Three tips that stand on the questions and motions of the directors, almost always in opposition. Advice without even the long-winded and bombastic statements by the Mayor, which marked the first conference. There is probably little to say for those who in the end, it defines what it promises. Who knows
What did you think our Mayor, the President Marcegaglia the general feeling held May 26, when he spoke of the lack of growth, not to decide as "a progressive accumulation of compromises, choices not made, will not upset anyone , responsibility is not taken until the end, inability to plan. " We do not know if he came up with something, but we sure: the current political situation in Busto Arsizio. A city that is immobilized, without an office district, the necessary planning. Touched by the kiss of the Snow Queen, if not in foothills sounded ridiculous.
decision brought the title of our editorial director. Is not a term much good. From the dictionary, in its political sense, "the practice of government characterized by a tendency to make decisions without consulting experts or their representative bodies, however, keeping very little account." That way, I had not idea of \u200b\u200bwho has used it. Decision, rather, as clarity of objectives, availability of a comparison, implementation. RESPONSIBILITY '. This is the role that the leader must exercise.
Who is the opposition has an obligation to a clear answer, once and for all, with a request for explanation is the same.
The PD does not have the war in his DNA. It has no enemies, only political opponents. This is the heritage of his political action, that the party has not agreed to bust, will not agree, do not agree with anyone. This is the line of the Democratic Party and its governing bodies. No one is allowed to behave differently.
The shopping list of concerns we raised, not taken seriously by the majority if not actually rejected, so long. Other times, we have demonstrated on several issues constructively and collaboratively, knowing that was to ask for the good of the city, not the majority or the opposition. The issues on the table that we think should be dissected and discussed them have jobs, and often. The other problem is: someone is also treated, recommendations and resolutions have put together a bipartisan consensus. And then? And then nothing. Everything remains the same.
Today it's time to budget. For us, for the city. We are not afraid to say that complex problems were inherited. One for all: the investigation of the Court of Auditors, the local machine in stand by.
But a problem can not become an excuse for inactivity, the absence of change, for insulation. For years prior majorities have been accused of "wanting to" isolate, to think self-sufficient, not to cultivate relationships with the surrounding area. True or false, is not the point. Today the feeling is that we are isolated because no effect, whereas the surrounding area did not then all that want to talk to us, since they can organize themselves and relate positively to surrounding reality.
Other opposition not all, institutionally choose legitimately different ways of personal conduct towards those who do not feel the same way. Next, as regards the coordinates policies, some are partially divergent, having made an election opposed. With those who have shared with us mayoral candidate and political program, there are now conditions for a shared path, however difficult. Because, probably, the political link was wrong from the outset in the formulation and the substance, just like the ones that believed in the coalition were soon realized. It is no coincidence that in the end, even at provincial and national roads have been divided. This bust was perhaps the forerunner of the times unfortunately.
Bob Kennedy, which marks the fortieth of the assassination, said: "A government can do with almost everyone, not a policy." Kennedy wanted to return the character of communities in a fragmented and disintegrated entity: it can be a policy to work today and qui.Speriamo that the explanation is clear, if not the blame is only those who tried to explain.

Pulmonary Hypertension Alcoholism

Littlest Pet Shop Rust

I. .. losers! If citttadini not follow you, do not vote, they are not fools

This time I will use the space allotted for " sparigliare cards" as they say. In 'speech last week, talking about the level of politics in our city, I wrote: "When readers read these lines, we will know the outcome of the referendum on the silos of Piazza Vittorio Emanuele. We will be in full battle and confusion, because, make no mistake, whatever happens there will be only winners and no loser. will be unhappy all again against each other armed . "Not that I need special skills to understand the prophetic, but the confirmation that the comments before, and the City Council Tuesday, 27 then gave those statements, throwing into turmoil .
Starting from the results: the total number of claimants was slightly more than 60,000 people, with a quorum of 33%. They voted for the referendum in 5695, accounting for 8, 69. The "yes" were 662, the "no" 5019. The press has obviously flop, the magnitude of unexpected defeat, some brilliant journalist pointed out that if three thousand signatures were collected in his time to promote this referendum, probably not even the family members were persuaded to participate, not to mention friends and acquaintances!
Eminent citizens have spoken in favor of voting, especially for the 'no'. The majority, let's face it, he seemed in a state of confusion: some people asked to vote yes, someone to vote no ... Without the necessary exception of the Latta links with Youth Action, which took a firm stand for the abstention by clear arguments.
As far as we are concerned, the official position of the Democratic Party has been well defined and without fear, " not vote: majority inefficient referendum items."
Viewed what happened, the words that summed up to a referendum occurred objectively and without too many twists in the situation we have to be read by Youth Action, "The rules were clear from the outset: there is a quorum to be overcome and there are three options to vote for, against and abstaining. According to someone there who has lost and who won in our opinion there is only one winner: Busto Arsizio. Agree more.
But no. On board we have heard the proponents of the referendum - Audio Porphyry, Marta Tosi, Antonello Corrado - "Brand" in various ways, the 5019 voting "no" if they had acquired some alleged hegemony. Those back home, according to our, or were uninformed or, at best, uninterested in democracy.
What then have democratically decided to do what they thought was appropriate, wisely and deliberately, as it should be, is that even touches un'dea the losers. And we repeat: the soundly defeated! addition, it is not the responsibility of the defeat of those who have exercised conscientiously their right to abstain, in which a referendum is as good as an explanation of vote, do not touch them at all.
Someone should sooner or later, with tact and kindness, explain to them that if citizens do not follow you, do not vote, they are not to be fools; opponents are not even to be in bad faith: you not to be convincing. A did not follow!
who thinks so high that it can not be wrong so abysmal, "said a philosopher. Conversely, those who think incorrectly, that can not be wrong ... so grotesque .
It is now clear what we meant by the opening sentence, "sparigliare cards": Do not close the enclosure of the "we" and "you", do not think that we can not share an opinion about a problem with the city who is politically away from us, and instead go to the substance of the facts and behavior.
This is all the more necessary because in the future implementation the project must include several steps yet in committee, and at least two in the municipal council. He must carefully evaluate certain aspects, to understand their implementation. Now a serious debate on this should be a must for political forces that are called upon to express themselves in decision-making bodies. We would hope that much can happen, with the optimism of the will. Busto, if nothing else.
We would like, even if the pessimism of reason tells us more.
Perhaps, as he said Giampiero Rossi, has lost his taste for politics because you are no longer capable of doing politics. In the sense of what the community called " Truh Well Told", the truth that good. Where is truth to the idea, value, maybe the solution to the problems with its implementation time and financial considerations. And if that is good for rejection of rhetoric and platitudes, the refusal of shortcuts and innovative communications capabilities.
Fine words, but that has to do with much of the ruling class of bust?

Heated Towel Rail Leaking Valve

ALL GUILTY, GUILTY NO Maybe the manager is right, but I'm not entirely convinced

I read a recent book on Aldo Moro, written by his secretary and spokesman for Corrado Guerzoni, and I dwell on this sentence of the assassinated President, delivered at a conference in the late '60s: "The only technocratic, subordination technicist be overcome by the policy framework, the willingness political ideologies not recovering as an archetype but as a moment of cultural development in the light of ideal aspiration, a critical investigation of the deep anguish of our time ... Take into account public opinion does not mean supporting him in all his moods, assuming a passive representation. One must understand the people but not to yield. "
thinking I will quote a sentence of the editorial our Director Information on the number 19. Citing concisely the unworthy - but not uncommon - the spectacle of the City Council of 5 Last May, he writes: "Let's face it, all our politicians that we elect are guilty of the racket in town." Are guilty and those who promote the uproar, and those who suffer and those who do not manage it. Perhaps the director is right. Maybe, but I'm not entirely convinced. His attack is very similar to the classic "all guilty, no guilt."
However, persuaded or not, it calls into question, and on a topic of vital importance for the future of politics at every level. For very small cog in the political, which I am, I consider it a duty to try to prove yourself reflecting with my fellow citizens.
What I see is the connection between the argument of Moro, and the reprimand of Marcora? And 'this: I would say that between a prophetic vision of the decline of Politics, in all its aspects, and taking cognizance of the future decline.
does not matter if the worst has happened in parliament: you eat a toast is an injury, and all this goes too pompous. No matter whether on television and in print who has the biggest gun the larger space, and becomes os'inventa the "character".
Although the conditions in which we have to do this, give its opinion is necessary. If the assessment is negative, the route must be changed. From us, now, from here: Busto Arsizio.
When readers read these lines, we will know the outcome of the referendum on the silos of Piazza Vittorio Emanuele. We will be in full battle and confusion, because, make no mistake, whatever happens there will be only winners and no losers, everyone will be discontent and again against each other with guns.
Result? The citizens, who already for the most part they understood a little earlier, then they will understand even less, ie after paying his own pocket to not decide anything, and they voted their representatives to undertake the task of doing so.
Not that it was a great decision, a silo of 150 parking spaces, public! However, if ruler is unable to promote the comparison, and take their decisions in time to match the needs of the city and not to the Bible, you can expect anything else? If your positions "against" riddled with nonsense because the more the big gun and more people do not understand but is scared, you get away?
the cry: "Who is not with me is against me, perhaps even dishonest" are masters of the pipers of the moralism of begging.
Dear Editor, get up and go is sometimes a temptation . But unproductive. Nobody cares, in the long run would not even make sense. You've been elected, it is your duty to complete the mandate that the people you have assigned. In the context where you are to work, you have no choice but it is what it is.
The real task, ultimately, is to leave behind the lines of the battles, the contrasts increasingly empty of content, that opposition has become sterile. Muster all the energy and the people available to develop not only a program, obviously essential, but above all an idea of \u200b\u200bthe city we want, according to a vision of the future that we have in mind. Bring to the attention of voters, giving them all the elements to choose and decide, by understand who we are, what we want and what we reject. In a confrontation in which the Parties mutually recognize the legitimacy democratica.Qualcosa seems to be happening in our country. Something with the new Statute of Lombardia is also done in the area in which we live. I think there is now the possibility to overcome the formation conservative opinion and the parties, aiming to build strong identities and consistent, yet flexible and close to the company at every turn, who can meet the needs of an Italy set in Europe and worldwide. Each, in its small way, will do its part.