I read a recent book on Aldo Moro, written by his secretary and spokesman for Corrado Guerzoni, and I dwell on this sentence of the assassinated President, delivered at a conference in the late '60s: "The only technocratic, subordination technicist be overcome by the policy framework, the willingness political ideologies not recovering as an archetype but as a moment of cultural development in the light of ideal aspiration, a critical investigation of the deep anguish of our time ... Take into account public opinion does not mean supporting him in all his moods, assuming a passive representation. One must understand the people but not to yield. "
thinking I will quote a sentence of the editorial our Director Information on the number 19. Citing concisely the unworthy - but not uncommon - the spectacle of the City Council of 5 Last May, he writes: "Let's face it, all our politicians that we elect are guilty of the racket in town." Are guilty and those who promote the uproar, and those who suffer and those who do not manage it. Perhaps the director is right. Maybe, but I'm not entirely convinced. His attack is very similar to the classic "all guilty, no guilt."
However, persuaded or not, it calls into question, and on a topic of vital importance for the future of politics at every level. For very small cog in the political, which I am, I consider it a duty to try to prove yourself reflecting with my fellow citizens.
What I see is the connection between the argument of Moro, and the reprimand of Marcora? And 'this: I would say that between a prophetic vision of the decline of Politics, in all its aspects, and taking cognizance of the future decline.
does not matter if the worst has happened in parliament: you eat a toast is an injury, and all this goes too pompous. No matter whether on television and in print who has the biggest gun the larger space, and becomes os'inventa the "character".
Although the conditions in which we have to do this, give its opinion is necessary. If the assessment is negative, the route must be changed. From us, now, from here: Busto Arsizio.
When readers read these lines, we will know the outcome of the referendum on the silos of Piazza Vittorio Emanuele. We will be in full battle and confusion, because, make no mistake, whatever happens there will be only winners and no losers, everyone will be discontent and again against each other with guns.
Result? The citizens, who already for the most part they understood a little earlier, then they will understand even less, ie after paying his own pocket to not decide anything, and they voted their representatives to undertake the task of doing so.
Not that it was a great decision, a silo of 150 parking spaces, public! However, if ruler is unable to promote the comparison, and take their decisions in time to match the needs of the city and not to the Bible, you can expect anything else? If your positions "against" riddled with nonsense because the more the big gun and more people do not understand but is scared, you get away?
the cry: "Who is not with me is against me, perhaps even dishonest" are masters of the pipers of the moralism of begging.
Dear Editor, get up and go is sometimes a temptation . But unproductive. Nobody cares, in the long run would not even make sense. You've been elected, it is your duty to complete the mandate that the people you have assigned. In the context where you are to work, you have no choice but it is what it is.
The real task, ultimately, is to leave behind the lines of the battles, the contrasts increasingly empty of content, that opposition has become sterile. Muster all the energy and the people available to develop not only a program, obviously essential, but above all an idea of \u200b\u200bthe city we want, according to a vision of the future that we have in mind. Bring to the attention of voters, giving them all the elements to choose and decide, by understand who we are, what we want and what we reject. In a confrontation in which the Parties mutually recognize the legitimacy democratica.Qualcosa seems to be happening in our country. Something with the new Statute of Lombardia is also done in the area in which we live. I think there is now the possibility to overcome the formation conservative opinion and the parties, aiming to build strong identities and consistent, yet flexible and close to the company at every turn, who can meet the needs of an Italy set in Europe and worldwide. Each, in its small way, will do its part.
0 comments:
Post a Comment