13, 27, May 10. It is not the recitation of the rosary, but the dates of the last councils. They all share a characteristic bleak lack the deliberative acts . That is to say, those measures that characterize the work of the junta, and promote healthy debate between the opposition political forces, are anticipated for concrete actions in the area. Three tips that stand on the questions and motions of the directors, almost always in opposition. Advice without even the long-winded and bombastic statements by the Mayor, which marked the first conference. There is probably little to say for those who in the end, it defines what it promises. Who knows
What did you think our Mayor, the President Marcegaglia the general feeling held May 26, when he spoke of the lack of growth, not to decide as "a progressive accumulation of compromises, choices not made, will not upset anyone , responsibility is not taken until the end, inability to plan. " We do not know if he came up with something, but we sure: the current political situation in Busto Arsizio. A city that is immobilized, without an office district, the necessary planning. Touched by the kiss of the Snow Queen, if not in foothills sounded ridiculous.
decision brought the title of our editorial director. Is not a term much good. From the dictionary, in its political sense, "the practice of government characterized by a tendency to make decisions without consulting experts or their representative bodies, however, keeping very little account." That way, I had not idea of \u200b\u200bwho has used it. Decision, rather, as clarity of objectives, availability of a comparison, implementation. RESPONSIBILITY '. This is the role that the leader must exercise.
Who is the opposition has an obligation to a clear answer, once and for all, with a request for explanation is the same.
The PD does not have the war in his DNA. It has no enemies, only political opponents. This is the heritage of his political action, that the party has not agreed to bust, will not agree, do not agree with anyone. This is the line of the Democratic Party and its governing bodies. No one is allowed to behave differently.
The shopping list of concerns we raised, not taken seriously by the majority if not actually rejected, so long. Other times, we have demonstrated on several issues constructively and collaboratively, knowing that was to ask for the good of the city, not the majority or the opposition. The issues on the table that we think should be dissected and discussed them have jobs, and often. The other problem is: someone is also treated, recommendations and resolutions have put together a bipartisan consensus. And then? And then nothing. Everything remains the same.
Today it's time to budget. For us, for the city. We are not afraid to say that complex problems were inherited. One for all: the investigation of the Court of Auditors, the local machine in stand by.
But a problem can not become an excuse for inactivity, the absence of change, for insulation. For years prior majorities have been accused of "wanting to" isolate, to think self-sufficient, not to cultivate relationships with the surrounding area. True or false, is not the point. Today the feeling is that we are isolated because no effect, whereas the surrounding area did not then all that want to talk to us, since they can organize themselves and relate positively to surrounding reality.
Other opposition not all, institutionally choose legitimately different ways of personal conduct towards those who do not feel the same way. Next, as regards the coordinates policies, some are partially divergent, having made an election opposed. With those who have shared with us mayoral candidate and political program, there are now conditions for a shared path, however difficult. Because, probably, the political link was wrong from the outset in the formulation and the substance, just like the ones that believed in the coalition were soon realized. It is no coincidence that in the end, even at provincial and national roads have been divided. This bust was perhaps the forerunner of the times unfortunately.
Bob Kennedy, which marks the fortieth of the assassination, said: "A government can do with almost everyone, not a policy." Kennedy wanted to return the character of communities in a fragmented and disintegrated entity: it can be a policy to work today and qui.Speriamo that the explanation is clear, if not the blame is only those who tried to explain.
0 comments:
Post a Comment